TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - I dont agree with your explanation if that is what it is.
People Seeking Info
 
   


     
Subject I dont agree with your explanation if that is what it is.
     
Posted by eriksu9 on August 17, 2007 at 3:32 PM
  This message has been viewed 41 times.
     
In Reply To Check your facts. posted by BradZ (FL) on August 17, 2007 at 03:11 PM
     
Message This system was ahead of its time along with all the other characteristics of the "Z" car. Subaru is one out of how many cars that were offered in that era with 4 wheel steering? Subaru was not a sports car at that time imo. Name a sports car that had 4 wheel steering during that time besides Skyline for that is also Nissan. Not many is my point. Any option that gives 1 or 2 more degrees of steering radius on the rear of a sports car or on any car for that matter has to increase the performance of that car imo.
Product differential and major design feature are two diff. adjectives. Uncomparable terminology imo. So, If what you are saying is correct, a couple extra degrees in steering on the rear end on the "Z" car or any car for that matter is not going to matter or be inconclusive and not help in steering variances? I cant agree with this logic.

 Click here to visit my bands website!Hook up your Z here!
****472 RWHP/461 TORQUE ON 110 RACE GAS @21 PSI
****438 RWHP ON 93 OCTANE PUMP GAS/STOCK MOTOR****
****429 FT LBS/TQ*******************************

Also own:

2001 Harley Davidson Custom Softail Deuce
1997 Ford Explorer XLT V8 AWD
1993 300ZX 2+2 NA
1991 Yamaha YZ250
1985 Ford Bronco 3" lift, 35" Tires

Sold:
1986 Yamaha FJ1100
1987 Nissan 300zx na(Z31)
1979 280ZX 2+2
1972 MGB
1968 Pontiac Firebird
1972 Nissan 240Z, dual webber carbs, etc

     
Follow Ups  
     
Post a
Followup

You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.